The right evidence,
for each control.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each public page designated canonical, in the declared request context.

Evidence
Intent per URL; command and tool version; dated GET trace, URLs and statuses of every hop, final headers and truncation indicators.

Method
Perform a GET without conditional caching; record every hop and final response. Declare agent, headers, cookies/authentication, network, time and time/size/redirect bounds.

Acceptance criteria
A complete final 200 response is observed. An observed final 204, 206, 4xx or 5xx contradicts this expectation; HEAD alone or 304 without a representation is insufficient.

When the result remains inconclusive
Timeout, DNS/TLS failure, interrupted chain, reached bound, incomplete capture, HEAD only or 304 without a retained body: inconclusive, without an inferred SEO fault.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Request context and bounds are declared before the test; 200 is a TSEP requirement for this population.

Limitations
Neither continuous availability nor an actual Googlebot response. An observed chain does not validate TS02.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each final response whose content can be compared to intent.

Evidence
HTTP trace, complete body and dated prior intent with URL, reference digest and any markers/stability policy; extraction, computed values and tool/version. Hash after transfer and content decoding, before any transformation. Literal case-sensitive markers within each decoded HTML source-text segment: character references resolved; comments, script/style, tags and attributes excluded; segments never concatenated across markup. For text/plain, the entire decoded body. No whitespace normalization or regular expressions. The distinct parsed profile normalizes source CRLF/CR to LF before reference expansion without changing criteria; retain both projections, contexts, positions, reported errors, results and tools. Identical contexts are referenced without removing segments; trees can be reconstructed from the body and exact tools.

Method
First compare final URL with expected_final_url, then complete-body SHA-256 with expected_body_sha256. Fix references, any stable policy and markers before measurement. The changed non-stable body branch uses the historical reader unless prior identity_reader: html-tree-markers-v1 selects two whole-document static hypotheses, byte-attributed parsed segments and literal criteria. Hashing still covers the unchanged complete body. Draft.6 excludes attributable structural ASCII whitespace under html or across only body/html end tags, retaining original intervals and bytes; see migration-0.3.0-draft.6. The distinct html-tree-markers-v2 profile excludes noscript segments from all marker matching, including rechecks. The v1 profile retains its historical semantics. An intent must explicitly name the selected profile before the new capture. The distinct html-tree-markers-v3 profile covers main-document HTML text: attributed noscript/iframe/foreign-subtree exclusions; an excluded forbidden marker prevents pass; only duplicate-attribute parse5 errors are admitted, with no directive interpretation. ASCII whitespace across ignored end tags requires exact reconstruction. See migration-0.3.0-draft.7 for limits and explicit migration.

Acceptance criteria
Different final URL: fail. At the same URL, identical digest: pass. Otherwise, representation: stable requires fail. Otherwise, under the historical reader, valid markers yield fail if any required marker is missing or any forbidden marker is present. Pass requires at least one required marker, all required markers present and all forbidden markers absent. Forbidden-only markers all absent: inconclusive. Without markers or declared stability: inconclusive. HTTP status does not replace this comparison. Under html-tree-markers-v1, each complete reading compares all markers; both pass gives pass, both fail gives fail, every other pair is inconclusive. URL, hash and stability precedence remains unchanged.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/truncated capture, unknown decoding, missing/invalid reference URL or subsequent intent: inconclusive. At an identical URL, missing/invalid reference digest: inconclusive. When digests differ without stability, absent, empty, malformed or contradictory markers, unresolved extraction, or forbidden-only markers all absent: inconclusive. A different URL remains fail even without a reference digest. For the parsed profile: divergent hypotheses, reported parse5 errors, nonblank foreign text outside exclusions, unsupported frames/contexts, unattributable spans, unavailable runtime or exceeded bound remain inconclusive without fallback.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
The owner fixes a reference representation before collection; its business relevance remains their responsibility. Comparison is automatic; defining intent is not. Any selected profile and its criteria are declared in new intent before capture; no silent selection or conversion of historical intents.

Limitations
A changed digest alone does not prove wrong content. Source-text extraction measures neither CSS/DOM visibility nor semantic similarity; title and CSS-hidden text may count. Appropriate markers and a correct reference remain the owner’s responsibility. Wrong intent can validate wrong content. No engine soft-404 classification, indexing or undeclared routes. The new profile retains title/textarea/options/hidden text, excludes HTML/SVG scripts/styles and inactive templates; its contract specifies refusals. No browser behavior, complete HTML validity or new Edikka assessment follows.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Variants and legacy URLs with a declared expected behavior.

Evidence
Plan, context, declared owner identity and role, date, decision, reason, assistance and review provenance; exact digest of examined criteria.

Method
Declare source, final destination, allowed redirect and terminal statuses, minimum/maximum redirect count and context. Check the supplied owner review, reasoned, dated between declaration and capture and digest-bound to plan/context.

Acceptance criteria
The owner explicitly approves the applicable plan before capture. Explicit rejection bound to the same plan is fail; missing or unattributable review remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, invalid or late plan; absent, unbound or mistimed review; unsupported mechanism. The tool supplies no human approval.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Whole-control non-applicability needs a separate positive inventory; a missing capture does not establish it.

Assumptions
The owner supplies criteria before capture; a laboratory author may supply an explicitly synthetic review. A digest binds records without authenticating a person.

Limitations
A valid redirect does not prove the semantic relevance of its destination. The executable reference covers bounded server-side HTTP trajectories; other mechanisms remain unestablished, without exempting the control.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Variants and legacy URLs with a declared expected behavior.

Evidence
Original HTTP requests/responses per hop, URL, completeness, client and context; prior plan. Proven contradictions survive later gaps and absent A01 approval.

Method
Read each attributable GET exchange in order, resolve Location, retain codes and URLs, count redirects and check terminal destination/status. Compare with the pre-capture plan without reconstructing missing responses. Prior profile http-trajectory-headers-v1 may conclude from complete headers after an attributable collector-2 byte-limit stop; the body remains incomplete and unevaluated.

Acceptance criteria
The complete chain matches declared destination, statuses and bounds, without a loop. A forbidden type, exceeded maximum, redirect without Location or return to a visited URL is fail as soon as a complete prefix establishes it. Wrong terminal destination/status or insufficient count is fail after an attributable terminal response.

When the result remains inconclusive
Unfinished chain without contradiction, collection limit, ambiguous Location, unsupported fragment/syntax, conditional/authenticated request, incomplete or unattributable capture. A collection limit does not prove a loop; exceeding an intended maximum is distinct. Bounded exception: prefix at the exact attributed byte limit with one overflow byte, without ambiguous headers or contradictory framing, under the explicit new profile only.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Whole-control non-applicability needs a separate positive inventory; a missing capture does not establish it.

Assumptions
The owner supplies criteria before capture; a laboratory author may supply an explicitly synthetic review. A digest binds records without authenticating a person.

Limitations
A valid redirect does not prove the semantic relevance of its destination. The executable reference covers bounded server-side HTTP trajectories; other mechanisms remain unestablished, without exempting the control.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
A route plan contains at least one existing, removed and nonexistent state in the synthetic scope.

Evidence
The plan and its fingerprint, content expectations, then for each route the GET request, raw HTTP response, status, time and complete body. Preserve contradictory observations and gaps separately.

Method
Verify the prior plan and its fingerprint; compare each attributable, complete GET/response for a .invalid route with the permitted statuses and literal UTF-8 markers fixed in the content expectations.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires exactly one complete response per route and every required state: 200 for existing, 404/410 for removed or nonexistent, required markers present and forbidden markers absent. A complete contradiction remains fail despite a duplicate, another incomplete capture or a gap. 206/304, missing, ambiguous or unattributable data remain inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/future/mismatched plan, missing route state, duplicate, incomplete HTTP, unattributable URL/client, 206/304, non-UTF-8 content, contradictory plan markers or incomplete matrix; an attributable contradiction remains fail.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Whole-control NA requires a positive, complete, reasoned and dated inventory establishing that no HTTP routing is in scope.

Assumptions
The plan, classifications and criteria are supplied and unauthenticated. Any attached review is a synthetic exercise, not independent approval.

Limitations
A .invalid capture tests no server. Markers are searched literally in the decoded body, without DOM, rendering, semantic judgment or engine classification. C covers only the declared matrix, not a whole site, availability over time, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each origin and path matrix whose crawl policy is assessed.

Evidence
Complete matrix, prior intent, context, full robots request/response, profile and reasoned per-resource result.

Method
Freeze the profile and expected allowances/disallows before observation. Interpret robots status, groups, rules and redirects in the initial origin context; retain the lines determining each outcome.

Acceptance criteria
Every observed policy matches declared intent. Unexpected permission and unexpected disallow are contradictions. Intentional absence can be compatible under the profile; no universal 200 requirement.

When the result remains inconclusive
Absent profile/capture/timing, unsupported syntax or unresolved error/cache: inconclusive. An attributable contradiction on another resource remains fail. Null, unsupported or inconsistent directive_crawler makes policy interpretation inconclusive without falling back to the client group. An independent HTTP contradiction remains limited to the observed client.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Choose the profile before measurement and keep it fixed for a campaign context; never select the favorable profile after observation. Distinguish RFC model, documented Google policy and unobserved actual cache. Optional directive_crawler=googlebot, frozen before capture, selects the Googlebot policy only on the representation received by crawler, the exact HTTP User-Agent. An explicit robots_policy with case-insensitive googlebot product_token is required, as for TS07. Without the field, historical behavior is preserved. Optional prior google-robotstxt-fields-v2 extends the closed registry of fields outside access scope using pinned google/robotstxt sources; old profiles remain unchanged with no automatic selection.

Limitations
semiAuto: matrix and profile suitability remain declared. The reference is bounded to one origin, documented profiles and supplied captures; no engine visit, ingestion or indexing is established. In explicit mode, every robots conclusion concerns the declared product on bytes received by the client, without proving the representation received by Googlebot. An HTTP status contrary to the plan (including 401/403/429/5xx when 200 is expected) remains fail for that client, never evidence of denial to Googlebot. Registry fields and sitemap are recorded without assessing usage preferences, TS42 or indexing and never delimit groups. Other fields and tolerances remain unsupported. Full line numbers and values are retained; reason previews disclose truncation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Resources explicitly required in the declared scope, including selected rendering resources.

Evidence
Resource plan, robots, complete HTTP traces, reasoned per-resource review with declared identity, date, provenance, assistance and binding digest.

Method
Compare robots policy and HTTP trajectories with planned destinations/statuses, then review responses for obstacles. Bind each supplied review to bytes, dates, intent and context. Retain gaps separately.

Acceptance criteria
Every required resource and observed hop is allowed under the profile, reaches its planned response and has no obstacle according to supplied review. Robots blocking, a contradictory response or an evidenced obstacle gives fail even when other evidence is missing.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing resource/review, unbound review, incomplete response, uncertainty or unsupported scope: inconclusive without erasing an established contradiction. Null, unsupported or inconsistent directive_crawler makes policy interpretation inconclusive without falling back to the client group. An independent HTTP contradiction remains limited to the observed client.

Non-applicability
No required resource in this scope, established by reasoned inventory review dated before the plan; an unjustified empty list is insufficient.

Assumptions
A test client does not authenticate as Googlebot; 200 alone cannot establish absence of a challenge. Software does not produce the review or authenticate reviewer identity. Optional directive_crawler=googlebot, frozen before capture, selects the Googlebot policy only on the representation received by crawler, the exact HTTP User-Agent. An explicit robots_policy with case-insensitive googlebot product_token is required, as for TS07. Without the field, historical behavior is preserved. Optional prior google-robotstxt-fields-v2 extends the closed registry of fields outside access scope using pinned google/robotstxt sources; old profiles remain unchanged with no automatic selection.

Limitations
Inventory sufficiency and human judgment are not fully automated. The reference covers one origin and attributable trajectories; it does not execute rendering or establish actual engine access. In explicit mode, every robots conclusion concerns the declared product on bytes received by the client, without proving the representation received by Googlebot. An HTTP status contrary to the plan (including 401/403/429/5xx when 200 is expected) remains fail for that client, never evidence of denial to Googlebot. Registry fields and sitemap are recorded without assessing usage preferences, TS42 or indexing and never delimit groups. Other fields and tolerances remain unsupported. Full line numbers and values are retained; reason previews disclose truncation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
A crawl policy, indexing objective or confidentiality claim exists in scope.

Evidence
Configuration, prior intent map, dates, scope, methods/effects and claims with bases; both records cover the target.

Method
Read intent.ts05_policy, dated before observed_at, and the configuration record. Compare crawl methods/effects, indexing goal/method and noindex visibility, then protection and the bases for deindexing/confidentiality claims. The policy_version=2 profile also compares authentication, authorization and HTTP 404/410 removal. Exclusion hidden by Disallow is contradictory even without a guarantee claim. Results concern declared plan consistency only; neither deindexing nor confidentiality is established.

Acceptance criteria
Pass means only that the supplied map is internally consistent and separates the three axes. A deindexing guarantee based only on Disallow fails; an inaccessible noindex directive does not establish exclusion. No positive verdict proves index state, real crawler access or server confidentiality.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, undated, incomplete or future plan; unsupported method; unknown index state; blocked or unknown noindex visibility; incomplete removal request; indeterminate protection basis.

Non-applicability
This atomic test does not accept a partial exemption. Whole-control NA requires a complete, reasoned inventory review dated before observed_at, establishing absence of relevant policy for every target.

Assumptions
Records are supplied and unauthenticated. The interpreter tests their form and declared consistency, not their truth or implementation.

Limitations
Semi-automated mechanism over a synthetic model. It does not parse live robots.txt, meta, X-Robots-Tag or HTTP; observe visits, indexing or removals; or test access controls. Pass qualifies only the consistency of the supplied map.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
At least one sensitive route is explicitly declared in the synthetic scope.

Evidence
Configuration/intent/http records linked to the target, plan fingerprint, routes/roles/tests, raw GET exchanges with timestamps, canaries and labelled cache triplets.

Method
Compare the prior plan bound to configuration with a complete synthetic GET matrix by route and role. Detect markers in headers and bodies, preserve contradictions before validating duplicates/gaps, verify same-origin redirects and cold/authorized/replay sequences.

Acceptance criteria
Pass covers only the complete supplied synthetic matrix: no unauthorized response contains a canary, denial is established under the plan, and every cold → authorized seed → anonymous replay triplet is complete and ordered. An attributable leak or unauthorized 2xx representation yields fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/future/inconsistent plan, missing/duplicate cell, absent/ambiguous role header, cross-origin redirect, 206, 304 without retained representation, unsupported encoding, or incomplete triplet/attribution.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Whole-control NA requires a complete, dated, reasoned inventory review linked to intent.

Assumptions
Fixtures are supplied, synthetic and unauthenticated. Role and cache labels prove neither identity nor a shared cache.

Limitations
No DNS, socket, live collection, real identity, authentication, cookies, real cache, TLS, JavaScript, path aliases, HEAD, or whole-site assessment. Canary detection covers only implemented encodings; other cases are inconclusive.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each document with a declared indexing objective, for an explicitly named crawler and context.

Evidence
Raw repeated headers, source HTML, token/crawler/effect table and dated technical reference. For non-HTML, the html-kind record documents why this surface does not apply, with Content-Type, without inventing HTML. This profile also retains both full meta inventories, contexts/namespaces, original tags/body-byte spans, templates, decoding, reported errors, versions and fingerprints in calculated observations linked to the report and compared during replay. The new profile additionally retains ordered HTTP/meta values, scopes, unknowns, dimension decisions and intervals in bound replayed observations.

Method
Inventory all final X-Robots-Tag headers and robots/target-crawler meta tags in source HTML, separate from redirect hops. Apply documented crawler semantics, including duplicates, scope, case, parameters and ignored rules. Optional source_reader=html-tree-directives-v1, declared before capture, constructs two complete static hypotheses without executing scripts; HTML robots/googlebot meta in head/body without foreign ancestors are combined separately with final headers. Ordinary template contents are retained but excluded from active directives. Optional prior presentation_reader=google-preview-intent-v1 compares minimum/maximum permission intervals for text, images and video under the preview-intent contract; extraction and states remain separate. The google-indexing-2026-10-v2 profile interprets standalone-page Googlebot directives. Certain exclusion remains evidence alongside unknown tokens. Dated restrictions are compared with capture time; ignored and unknown instructions are retained. Certain HTTP noindex remains interpretable even when body reading is unavailable. Access and rendering remain separate. Profile v2 requires commas between rules or separate fields/tags. A whitespace-only rule list is undocumented syntax: NT without decisive independent evidence; a certain contradiction in another field remains NC. RFC date commas inside unavailable_after are retained. Explicit v1 intent remains historical, with no implicit migration. V2 dates must be fully recognized by the bounded draft.9 migration grammar, identical across interpreters; plausible unsupported formats, suffixes or unseparated scope changes yield NT without decisive independent evidence. Even index follow stays NT: this limitation is explicit. Every two-digit RFC year is outside profile v2: NT without decisive independent evidence, even if the calendar or weekday appears to resolve the century. Only four-digit years are assessable. Negative zero offsets retain a known UTC instant. A restriction expires strictly after its date; equality does not establish expiration.

Acceptance criteria
Combined effects match the declared indexing objective and declared presentation/link restrictions. For Google: an applicable restriction prevails over permission, none includes noindex/nofollow; nofollow or a preview limit alone does not mean noindex. Missing directives are not failure when intent permits indexing. For this profile, two pass yield pass, two fail yield fail, every other pair stays inconclusive; never merge directives across alternative hypotheses or confuse them with observed rendered states. For this new profile, all possible values within the intended interval yield pass; all outside on one side yield fail; otherwise inconclusive. Independent contradiction prevails within a reading; existing source consensus and rendered priority remain.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing objective, unknown syntax/scope, partial capture or missing context: inconclusive. A documented ignored directive is recorded, not automatically treated as an error. Present but unsupported, null or inconsistent directive_crawler: inconclusive; no favorable fallback. For this profile: incomplete reading, reported error, unsupported encoding, declared open/closed shadow, template for, foreign-context robots metadata, missing content/mixed roles or near form defined by the contract, unknown directive and exceeded bound remain inconclusive. Unreadable HTML never becomes header-only agreement. The preview profile retains unqualified image defaults, max-snippet:0 video interaction, unsupported syntax and exceeded bounds as unknown under the contract’s conservative intervals. Noindex does not give a presentation pass.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Intent and crawler fixed before review; do not extrapolate Google rules to another engine. For indexifembedded or unavailable_after, include the required embedding context and date. Intent retains crawler as the exact HTTP User-Agent. Optional directive_crawler, frozen before collection and limited here to googlebot, selects directive semantics only for this client representation; it does not describe a response received by Googlebot. Without this field, historical behavior requires crawler=googlebot. Absent source_reader preserves the legacy reader; null/unknown or missing Node 24 never falls back. This profile requires explicit HTTP UTF-8 HTML, consumes one initial BOM and retains unreported repairs by the pinned parser. The bilingual source-directives contract specifies assumptions/bounds without asserting HTML validity. Bounds concern a permission cap, not actual display. Selection and bounds are prior; absent reader preserves historical behavior and no scalar is automatically migrated.

Limitations
Assesses observed declarations, not ingestion or actual indexing. A01 alone does not cover access or rendering. Automation is semiAuto: the bounded interpreter does not cover every syntax, crawler or context; unsupported inputs remain inconclusive and require review. This methodological choice does not simulate Google. No rendering, access, review or TS10 outcome is inferred. The preview profile assesses neither Google display, image availability, data-nosnippet nor licensed, structured-data or AI usage; it produces no review.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Every resource for which directive effects are assessed.

Evidence
Robots capture and interpretation for URL/crawler, HTTP trace and access assumptions documented in intent.

Method
Compare effective robots policy and access conditions for the target crawler; distinguish the test client response, explicit blocking and unobserved crawler access. With explicit directive_crawler, require an explicit robots_policy whose product_token matches googlebot case-insensitively; select that group and never fall back to the browser agent group.

Acceptance criteria
No observed obstacle prevents reading the directive in the declared context. Robots disallow contradicts a strategy relying on reading noindex. An attributable HTTP 401/403 remains fail even if robots evidence is missing.

When the result remains inconclusive
Unavailable or ambiguous policy, unresolved challenge, missing capture: inconclusive, never NA for missing access. The new path without a matching profile remains inconclusive. Attributable HTTP 401/403 denial retains precedence.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Policy is interpreted by the shared TS04 reader. A new profile is declared in intent before capture. Without robots_policy, legacy inputs retain the fixed legacy-exact-v1 profile without implicit coverage extension. The client does not authenticate as Googlebot. Intent retains crawler as the exact HTTP User-Agent. Optional directive_crawler, frozen before collection and limited here to googlebot, selects directive semantics only for this client representation; it does not describe a response received by Googlebot. Without this field, historical robots profiles retain their behavior. Optional prior google-robotstxt-fields-v2 extends the closed registry of fields outside access scope using pinned google/robotstxt sources; old profiles remain unchanged with no automatic selection.

Limitations
No evidence of an actual engine visit; TS04 and other access controls are not globally validated. Automation is semiAuto: the bounded interpreter does not cover every syntax, crawler or context; unsupported inputs remain inconclusive and require review. Registry fields and sitemap are recorded without assessing usage preferences, TS42 or indexing and never delimit groups. Other fields and tolerances remain unsupported. Full line numbers and values are retained; reason previews disclose truncation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Pages whose scripts or states can affect directives, or whose stability is not established.

Evidence
Retained headers/source HTML, prior plan, dated raw DOMs with binding digest of the HTTP trace, final URL, context, browser/version, script state, interactions, waiting conditions and errors. Reasoned comparison and limitations; no simulated engine capture. The new profile additionally retains ordered HTTP/meta values, scopes, unknowns, dimension decisions and intervals in bound replayed observations.

Method
Fix required states, interactions and waiting conditions before capture. Compare final headers and source HTML with each DOM, declaring browser/version, enabled scripts, time, errors and context. Bind each capture to the source response and target. Do not assume the engine renders initially noindex HTML. The DOM reader is chosen before capture: structured-inventory-v2, or the fixed legacy serialization reader when the field is absent. No fallback after refusal. The complete structured inventory retains namespaces, positions, duplicates, serialization and navigation attribution records; no node is removed based on its presumed origin. The optional new source_reader affects only the A01 source prerequisite, never each DOM reader; priority for an attributable rendered contradiction remains unchanged. Optional prior presentation_reader=google-preview-intent-v1 compares minimum/maximum permission intervals for text, images and video under the preview-intent contract; extraction and states remain separate.

Acceptance criteria
All required states are documented and compatible with intent in the declared context. A contradiction in a complete, attributable state is fail even if other states are missing. Removing initial noindex with JavaScript does not yield pass: A03 remains inconclusive unless a required state supplies another contradiction; A01 retains its own source verdict. For this new profile, all possible values within the intended interval yield pass; all outside on one side yield fail; otherwise inconclusive. Independent contradiction prevails within a reading; existing source consensus and rendered priority remain.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing required plan/capture, truncated state, script error, inconsistent source/target/context binding, invalid chronology, uninterpretable directive or late removal of initial noindex: inconclusive without an inferred pass. An established contradiction in another attributable state remains fail. For the structured reader: incomplete tree/transport, loading document, known API alteration, missing integrity history, separate source/DOM acquisition without same-navigation attribution or a different agent: inconclusive. A digest alone does not prove navigation. Present but unsupported, null or inconsistent directive_crawler: inconclusive; no favorable fallback. The preview profile retains unqualified image defaults, max-snippet:0 video interaction, unsupported syntax and exceeded bounds as unknown under the contract’s conservative intervals. Noindex does not give a presentation pass.

Non-applicability
Non-HTML or directive stability demonstrated by documented review; intent evidence references this justification and supporting records. No unsupported “no JS” assertion.

Assumptions
Required states are listed before the test; local and engine rendering remain distinct. The structured reader interprets HTML meta children directly in the real document head; ambiguous placement or shadow remains inconclusive. It retains combination with the declared navigation headers. Intent retains crawler as the exact HTTP User-Agent. Optional directive_crawler, frozen before collection and limited here to googlebot, selects directive semantics only for this client representation; it does not describe a response received by Googlebot. Without this field, historical behavior requires crawler=googlebot. Bounds concern a permission cap, not actual display. Selection and bounds are prior; absent reader preserves historical behavior and no scalar is automatically migrated.

Limitations
semiAuto: the plan and sufficiency of observations require review. The interpreter compares supplied captures; it does not execute JavaScript or establish exhaustive states, TS25, engine rendering or indexing. Supplied attribution and APIs are not authenticated; authored synthetic records are explicitly labeled, never actual visits. Frames, template fragments and closed shadow roots are outside scope. Bounds and migration are documented in docs/structured-rendering.md. The preview profile assesses neither Google display, image availability, data-nosnippet nor licensed, structured-data or AI usage; it produces no review.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicit selected URL set whose Google-reported state must be documented.

Evidence
Dated sourced plan, native request/response JSON and hashes, actual metadata, supplied evidence-bound reviews; inspection-evidence-v1 contract.

Method
Declare members, objectives/sources, selection reasons, prior knowledge and freshness policy; retain the bound prior plan review.

Acceptance criteria
Supported selection/objective review, plan and review before acquisition, no omitted member. Supplied contradiction or acquisition preceding the plan fails; absence alone is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, invalid or ambiguous evidence, review or binding; retain limitations, unknowns and API errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access is not NA.

Assumptions
Dates, authorship, provenance, access and attribution are supplied, never authenticated by hashes alone.

Limitations
Selected-set documentation only; non-live API and crawl time distinct from field timestamps. No current state, causality, TS12 or SEO outcome inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicit selected URL set whose Google-reported state must be documented.

Evidence
Dated sourced plan, native request/response JSON and hashes, actual metadata, supplied evidence-bound reviews; inspection-evidence-v1 contract.

Method
Read native bytes using diagnostic1, compare URL/property attribution, retain fields and check dates against prior policy.

Acceptance criteria
Every member has a usable response with known required fields and dates within policy. Explicitly allowed absent API fields stay visible; API errors and unknown values never become C.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, invalid or ambiguous evidence, review or binding; retain limitations, unknowns and API errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access is not NA.

Assumptions
Dates, authorship, provenance, access and attribution are supplied, never authenticated by hashes alone.

Limitations
Selected-set documentation only; non-live API and crawl time distinct from field timestamps. No current state, causality, TS12 or SEO outcome inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicit selected URL set whose Google-reported state must be documented.

Evidence
Dated sourced plan, native request/response JSON and hashes, actual metadata, supplied evidence-bound reviews; inspection-evidence-v1 contract.

Method
Read supplied review: exact API verdict claim, interpretation, relation to prior objective, temporal scope, typed explanation and operational decision.

Acceptance criteria
All facets are qualified; a documented discrepancy may pass. Explicit verdict/scope contradiction or contradiction judgment fails and survives independent unknowns. Missing review or unsupported cause remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, invalid or ambiguous evidence, review or binding; retain limitations, unknowns and API errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access is not NA.

Assumptions
Dates, authorship, provenance, access and attribution are supplied, never authenticated by hashes alone.

Limitations
Selected-set documentation only; non-live API and crawl time distinct from field timestamps. No current state, causality, TS12 or SEO outcome inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS09 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: configuration, intent.

Method
Read the native exclusion-register-v1 JSON register; compare each selected family with its prior mechanism, then require owner, rationale and review date. Require an evidence-bound review. The url-exclusion-observed-v2 profile requires a register, one representative HTTP response and robots.txt per family, followed by a review explicitly bound to the displayed evidence. A native contradiction remains NC without a review; a match without review remains NT. This sample does not establish the entire family, Google index state or confidentiality.

Acceptance criteria
Mechanisms agree and every family has governance information; supplied review supports the scope. A mechanism mismatch fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing or ambiguous fields, missing register or unbound review are inconclusive. Review date is a declared calendar date, not evidence that review occurred.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each family member and its declared canonicalization strategy.

Evidence
Family inventory in intent; headers and source (or html non-applicability record for non-HTML); extraction with location and method, required DOM attached when needed. Bind each capture to the family, context and date. Declare required methods and DOM states before assessment; bind DOMs to the HTTP trace by fingerprint. A rendering exemption needs a source-bound review and supporting records, not a bare “no JS” claim. Also retain profile observations: document, body, canonical/base, templates, prefix tokens, context, errors, decoding, sources/runtime and separate decisions; replay compares these records. Retain ordered HTTP diagnostics, raw fields/parameters, excluded/unknown contexts, requested/final URLs, timestamp and source-trace fingerprint.

Method
List members, preferred URL and expected method; compare final URLs, HTTP Link, HTML rel=canonical and required rendered states. Retain multiple declarations, even identical ones. The DOM reader is chosen before capture: structured-inventory-v2, or the fixed legacy serialization reader when the field is absent. No fallback after refusal. The complete structured inventory retains namespaces, positions, duplicates, serialization and navigation attribution records; no node is removed based on its presumed origin. Optional prior intent.canonical.source_reader=html-tree-canonical-v1 compares two complete static source hypotheses with byte-attributed source/tree positions. The source-canonical.md contract defines its boundaries. Optional prior intent.canonical.http_reader=http-link-context-v1 applies docs/http-canonical-context.md to final GET 200 Link fields; absent selection retains the historical reader.

Acceptance criteria
Present signals and those required by strategy identify the same absolute HTTP(S) URL without a fragment. HTML in head or HTTP Link are accepted; no universal HTML tag requirement. A relative canonical is fail for this TSEP rule without claiming Google cannot interpret it. Retain repeated identical declarations, which may agree; an attributable conflict remains fail despite another missing capture. Two source pass yield pass, two fail yield fail, otherwise inconclusive. Ordinary body canonical remains a contradiction even for the preferred URL; relative values are never resolved through base. Attributable HTTP Link, redirect and DOM contradictions remain independent of source unknowns. The new reader separates context from literal destination, retaining first rel and repeated declarations; unknowns prevent pass and independent attributable HTTP conflicts remain fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Incomplete family/intent, ambiguous Link, truncated document or missing required rendered state: inconclusive. For the structured reader: incomplete tree/transport, loading document, known API alteration, missing integrity history, separate source/DOM acquisition without same-navigation attribution or a different agent: inconclusive. A digest alone does not prove navigation. After-head reinsertion, indirect head descendant, foreign context, unknown/modifying attributes, declared shadow, incomplete bounded reading/diagnostics prevent success as defined by the contract; retain any separately qualified contradiction. Unknown HTTP selection, unqualified context/uncertain equivalence, extensions or unsupported syntax are inconclusive without favorable fallback; the HTTP contract fixes bounds and their scope.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Strategy distinguishes preferred canonical and duplicates; comparisons do not silently remove parameters or normalize case or slashes. In structured DOM, a difference between absolute raw href and the resolved property prevents a conclusion on that surface, without substituting either value or asserting an SEO defect. A relative or out-of-head canonical in ordinary DOM remains a TSEP contradiction; open shadow remains inconclusive. Absent field preserves legacy reading. Null/unknown or absent Node 24 never falls back. This profile neither validates HTML nor replaces rendering or supplied human judgment.

Limitations
Relative URLs, placement and convergence are TSEP criteria; engine canonical selection is not observed here. Supplied attribution and APIs are not authenticated; authored synthetic records are explicitly labeled, never actual visits. Frames, template fragments and closed shadow roots are outside scope. Bounds and migration are documented in docs/structured-rendering.md. Source scope only; A04 and DOM readers are not extended. The hypotheses are not coexisting observed rendered states. No Google canonical choice is inferred. No engine execution or destination normalization; an RFC-valid relative can fail TSEP’s absolute criterion. See draft.19 migration; historical reader preserved.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Every preferred destination in declared families.

Evidence
Destination trace and body tied to the family; declaration graph and reasoned content comparison. The human compatibility review identifies its author, date, each member compared with the preferred representation, reasoned judgment and exact examined captures by fingerprint. A missing/stale reference or unestablished comparison prevents pass. Also retain profile observations: document, body, canonical/base, templates, prefix tokens, context, errors, decoding, sources/runtime and separate decisions; replay compares these records. Retain ordered HTTP diagnostics, raw fields/parameters, excluded/unknown contexts, requested/final URLs, timestamp and source-trace fingerprint.

Method
Test the destination, retain GET and content; verify that any canonical there does not point elsewhere. Compare content with the declared family. The DOM reader is chosen before capture: structured-inventory-v2, or the fixed legacy serialization reader when the field is absent. No fallback after refusal. The complete structured inventory retains namespaces, positions, duplicates, serialization and navigation attribution records; no node is removed based on its presumed origin. Optional prior intent.canonical.source_reader=html-tree-canonical-v1 compares two complete static source hypotheses with byte-attributed source/tree positions. The source-canonical.md contract defines its boundaries. Optional prior intent.canonical.http_reader=http-link-context-v1 applies docs/http-canonical-context.md to final GET 200 Link fields; absent selection retains the historical reader.

Acceptance criteria
The expected destination is directly accessible with 200, without canonical chains or cycles, and compatible content. A duplicate may remain 200 and point to the preferred URL; not every duplicate final URL must equal it. Two source pass yield pass, two fail yield fail, otherwise inconclusive. Ordinary body canonical remains a contradiction even for the preferred URL; relative values are never resolved through base. Attributable HTTP Link, redirect and DOM contradictions remain independent of source unknowns. The new reader separates context from literal destination, retaining first rel and repeated declarations; unknowns prevent pass and independent attributable HTTP conflicts remain fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Uncollected destination, timeout or incomparable content: inconclusive. An observed 404/5xx, cycle or hop is a contradiction. For the structured reader: incomplete tree/transport, loading document, known API alteration, missing integrity history, separate source/DOM acquisition without same-navigation attribution or a different agent: inconclusive. A digest alone does not prove navigation. After-head reinsertion, indirect head descendant, foreign context, unknown/modifying attributes, declared shadow, incomplete bounded reading/diagnostics prevent success as defined by the contract; retain any separately qualified contradiction. Unknown HTTP selection, unqualified context/uncertain equivalence, extensions or unsupported syntax are inconclusive without favorable fallback; the HTTP contract fixes bounds and their scope.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
Content similarity is assessed in business context without a universal similarity threshold. In structured DOM, a difference between absolute raw href and the resolved property prevents a conclusion on that surface, without substituting either value or asserting an SEO defect. A relative or out-of-head canonical in ordinary DOM remains a TSEP contradiction; open shadow remains inconclusive. Absent field preserves legacy reading. Null/unknown or absent Node 24 never falls back. This profile neither validates HTML nor replaces rendering or supplied human judgment.

Limitations
A successful GET does not prove Google will select this URL; no temporal stability is inferred from one instant. A comparator can check the supplied review’s bindings and coverage; it does not turn that judgment into automatic content comparison. Supplied attribution and APIs are not authenticated; authored synthetic records are explicitly labeled, never actual visits. Frames, template fragments and closed shadow roots are outside scope. Bounds and migration are documented in docs/structured-rendering.md. Source scope only; A04 and DOM readers are not extended. The hypotheses are not coexisting observed rendered states. No Google canonical choice is inferred. No engine execution or destination normalization; an RFC-valid relative can fail TSEP’s absolute criterion. See draft.19 migration; historical reader preserved.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Families associated with a sitemap under the declared strategy.

Evidence
Raw sitemaps and index coverage, family/entry mapping and justification of omissions. Retain XML bytes and complete annotation values; bounded reason preview with explicit truncation.

Method
Compare entries from all sitemaps/indexes required for the family and preferred URL; retain exclusions justified by strategy. Reconcile captures of each index and all expected children. An observed failure remains fail when another branch is missing; an omission becomes fail only after the declared population has been fully examined. Optional sitemap-locations-v1 must be declared before capture; absence uses the fixed legacy reader, unknown values never fall back. Only direct Sitemaps 0.9 loc under url counts as a page URL; under sitemap it identifies children. Decode XML and trim surrounding XML whitespace only, then compare literally without URL normalization. Record recognized XHTML alternate, image and ordinary fields separately, without comparing them as page URLs.

Acceptance criteria
Observed and required entries agree with declared preference; a duplicate published as a competing canonical without justification is fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Incomplete index, unavailable expected sitemap or unknown strategy: inconclusive. Unknown reader, missing/wrong namespace, unsupported extension/attribute, duplicate leaf, ambiguous structure, mixed text, DTD/entities, malformed XML or exceeded bound: entire document inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No sitemap used for this family, established by documented strategy and inventory. Retain a sitemap record explaining absence; no whole-TS10 NA.

Assumptions
Sitemap scope is declared; absence is not inferred from a 404 at one guessed path. The new reader requires explicitly covered namespaces and structures; prefixes are arbitrary and annotation values are not validated. Preference remains supplied intent, not observed engine choice.

Limitations
Sitemap = published preference, not engine selection or an exhaustive site inventory. No hreflang, image or value-validity verdict. The bounded reader is not a full XML Schema validator. Profile, structural registry, limits and migration: docs/sitemap-locations.md and docs/migration-draft.14.md.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each family and declared source-page population.

Evidence
Crawl export with source URL, href, destination, pages actually visited, failures and exclusions; reconciliation with the declared population. Retain source HTML and DOMs needed for extraction, bound to their traces, contexts and dates; a rendering exemption is reviewed and supported. Exceptions identify source, destination and reason. The new profile retains inventory, namespaces, templates, tags/bytes, calculated URLs, bases/limits, versions, per-hypothesis decisions/counts in replayable observations.

Method
Extract links from the announced population; compare destinations and documented exceptions with canonical preference. The DOM reader is chosen before capture: structured-inventory-v2, or the fixed legacy serialization reader when the field is absent. No fallback after refusal. The complete structured inventory retains namespaces, positions, duplicates, serialization and navigation attribution records; no node is removed based on its presumed origin. Optional prior intent.canonical.links.source_reader=html-tree-links-v1 qualifies attributed HTML a/area hrefs, base and WHATWG resolution under two static hypotheses. source-link-policy.md defines this method; earlier rendered readers remain unchanged. Draft.18 adds html-tree-links-v2: a first base whose href fails WHATWG parsing adds base uncertainty; v1 remains unchanged. Computation against the final URL is then conditional, without inferring a destination for dependent hrefs. source-link-policy-v2.md defines this delta.

Acceptance criteria
All assessed links follow strategy; no unexplained competing destination. Zero links can satisfy the rule only when the announced population is fully examined. An attributable competing link remains fail even if another source page or required state is missing. Two source passes yield pass, two failures yield fail, otherwise inconclusive. An uncertain base cannot establish failure for dependent hrefs; an independent qualified absolute conflict remains usable. Zero counts and limited convergence scope remain visible through control and gate without adding a link-presence requirement.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing source pages, unexamined links or absent crawl: inconclusive, never success from zero results. For the structured reader: incomplete tree/transport, loading document, known API alteration, missing integrity history, separate source/DOM acquisition without same-navigation attribution or a different agent: inconclusive. A digest alone does not prove navigation. Null/unknown source selection, missing Node24, incomplete traversal/diagnostic: inconclusive without fallback. SVG/foreign ancestors, declared shadow and duplicate link attributes remain unknown; unmodeled CSP/base prevents conclusive dependent-href resolution.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption when the control applies.

Assumptions
The crawl checks a declared population; it does not by itself prove that population exhaustive. Structured reader v2 retains raw hrefs; bounded resolution only without a base declaration and with baseURI equal to the final URL. Shadow links or unsupported syntax remain inconclusive. Family URLs must already equal their WHATWG serialization or source is inconclusive, without silent normalization. Outside-family URLs are retained, never guessed duplicates. No-namespace href with no nofollow/download filtering; static destination only. Empty/whitespace base href, data/javascript schemes and CSP remain distinct from that parse failure; never select a second base instead.

Limitations
No extrapolation to external links, pages outside the population or future dates. Supplied attribution and APIs are not authenticated; authored synthetic records are explicitly labeled, never actual visits. Frames, template fragments and closed shadow roots are outside scope. Bounds and migration are documented in docs/structured-rendering.md. Source profile measures neither activation, link presence/sufficiency, forms/events nor Google behavior. Bounds, retained out-of-scope elements and migration: source-link-policy.md and migration-draft.17.md. Version2 correction and preserved historical results: migration-draft.18.md. The diagnostic establishes neither a general browser bug nor a Google state.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS11 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, html, content, intent.

Method
For each declared duplicate or distinct pair, read both complete UTF-8 HTML responses and retain fingerprints. Require a bound comparative review including source-scope sufficiency.

Acceptance criteria
Both contents are available and the supplied editorial review supports the declared relation. Contradictory review fails; text equality or similarity never supplies that review.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing content, unsupported HTML, render-dependent comparison or missing judgment: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS11 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, html, content, intent.

Method
Read HTTP and HTML canonicals separately for both members. A duplicate points to the preference; a distinct page points to itself. Require review of the decision and source scope.

Acceptance criteria
Every qualified declaration agrees with the prior editorial relation; a conflicting declaration fails even if another surface is unavailable.

When the result remains inconclusive
No explicit canonical, uninterpretable source or required rendering unavailable: inconclusive, without inferring engine selection.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected set whose reported and captured canonicals must be compared.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, native API JSON, HTTP traces, supplied structured DOM states and reviews bound to exact evidence; canonical-comparison-v1 contract.

Method
Declare selection/objectives, prior knowledge, sourced preference, readers and rendered states; qualify the bound plan before every acquisition.

Acceptance criteria
Supported selection/objectives/preferences/surfaces/temporal_policy judgments, prior chronology and complete set. Supplied contradiction or acquisition before plan fails; gaps are inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unknown/invalid evidence, required state, value, policy, review or binding; retain limits and errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access or rendering is not NA.

Assumptions
Supplied data, dates, provenance and judgments; hashes do not authenticate people, navigation or history.

Limitations
Missing required rendering or absent Google canonical: inconclusive. Literal comparison without inferred URL equivalence, live state, causality, TS10 or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected set whose reported and captured canonicals must be compared.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, native API JSON, HTTP traces, supplied structured DOM states and reviews bound to exact evidence; canonical-comparison-v1 contract.

Method
Read native evidence and both static HTML hypotheses; retain separate HTTP/HTML/DOM candidates, dates and literal comparisons.

Acceptance criteria
Qualified API, present Google canonical, readable HTTP/HTML and every planned DOM state; prior thresholds satisfied, duplicates retained. Different values allowed; source-only/absent Google remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unknown/invalid evidence, required state, value, policy, review or binding; retain limits and errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access or rendering is not NA.

Assumptions
Supplied data, dates, provenance and judgments; hashes do not authenticate people, navigation or history.

Limitations
Missing required rendering or absent Google canonical: inconclusive. Literal comparison without inferred URL equivalence, live state, causality, TS10 or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected set whose reported and captured canonicals must be compared.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, native API JSON, HTTP traces, supplied structured DOM states and reviews bound to exact evidence; canonical-comparison-v1 contract.

Method
Examine every surface value claim in a supplied evidence-bound review with interpretation, chronology, changes, objective, explanation and decision.

Acceptance criteria
Claims match known lists, supported qualification, reasoned relation and decision. A contradicted claim retains fail despite another unknown; missing review or unsupported established-cause assertion is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unknown/invalid evidence, required state, value, policy, review or binding; retain limits and errors.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; lack of access or rendering is not NA.

Assumptions
Supplied data, dates, provenance and judgments; hashes do not authenticate people, navigation or history.

Limitations
Missing required rendering or absent Google canonical: inconclusive. Literal comparison without inferred URL equivalence, live state, causality, TS10 or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Page entries in prior declared sitemap files, bounded supplied-sitemap-quality-v1 profile.

Evidence
Plan, dated XML/gzip originals and SHA-256, index/position/loc of each entry. Literal repetitions remain visible without automatic failure.

Method
Reconcile declared roots/children with complete originals; read each page loc, retain occurrences and check absolute HTTP(S) syntax.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires all declared files and qualified locations. A relative loc, fragment, credentials or invalid port fails; missing coverage is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous or out-of-profile plan, document, child, binding, capture or review; exceeded bound. Retain every independent fail and other unknowns.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; missing evidence is not NA.

Assumptions
Prior plan, literal URLs, supplied window of at most24hours and original integrity. Declared dates, context and judgments, without authentication.

Limitations
Declared supplied file/page population; bounded HTML sources and unauthenticated supplied reviews. No inferred real audit, site completeness, whole TS15 result, Google-selected canonical, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Page entries in prior declared sitemap files, bounded supplied-sitemap-quality-v1 profile.

Evidence
File and HTTP request/response originals, per-page context/date, plan and review with SHA-256 of the examined evidence. No missing review generated by the tool.

Method
For each distinct native URL, check direct GET200, HTTP/HTML Googlebot directives and literal canonical; reconcile prior strategy and review bound to page and files.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires qualified source, identical explicit canonical, useful/indexable/self-canonical intent and supported review, rendering source-only. Redirect, complete non200 status, noindex, different canonical or contradicted judgment fails. Required rendering, absent canonical/review or unsupported format is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous or out-of-profile plan, document, child, binding, capture or review; exceeded bound. Retain every independent fail and other unknowns.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; missing evidence is not NA.

Assumptions
Prior plan, literal URLs, supplied window of at most24hours and original integrity. Declared dates, context and judgments, without authentication.

Limitations
Declared supplied file/page population; bounded HTML sources and unauthenticated supplied reviews. No inferred real audit, site completeness, whole TS15 result, Google-selected canonical, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Page entries carrying lastmod in the prior population; supplied-sitemap-lastmod-v1 profile. Index lastmod is outside scope.

Evidence
Dated/fingerprinted XML original, file URL and entry position, original UTF8 JSON event with SHA-256, change_id, URL, changed_at, kind and description; attributed bound review.

Method
Read each native page lastmod; compare its UTC date or zoned instant with an attributed original JSON event, then check the bound significance review.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires matching nonfuture dates, attributed content event and supported review. Invalid/future date, traceable mismatch, file generation alone or contradicted review fails. Insufficient history/review is inconclusive. Complete native absence of lastmod is an atomic exemption, never a defect.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous or out-of-profile plan, document, child, binding, capture or review; exceeded bound. Retain every independent fail and other unknowns. Missing timezone or out-of-profile lastmod precision is inconclusive, never a fabricated defect.

Non-applicability
Atomic not-applicable only for absence read from a complete native entry. All-exempt entries produce neither C nor automatic whole-control NA.

Assumptions
Prior plan, literal URLs, supplied window of at most24hours and original integrity. Declared dates, context and judgments, without authentication.

Limitations
Matching date and supplied review do not prove an actual change or its significance. UTC-day or zoned-instant precision; no complete CMS history, ideal freshness or engine processing inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared population of supplied native sitemap files; roots are not automatically discovered.

Evidence
Base64/SHA-256 originals, declared URLs/dates and set plan; native-sitemap-files-v1 bounds.

Method
Check strict UTF-8,0.9 root, unique nonempty loc and unique ordered leaves; DTD/unqualified extensions stay unknown.

Acceptance criteria
Every complete file passes the bounded structure; established structural contradiction fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/ambiguous file, incomplete stream, unknown profile, reader bound, nested index or unqualified extension; independent violation retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied URL, date, origin and completeness, unauthenticated. No server observation.

Limitations
Supplied files only, no observed server or site completeness. No full XSD, lastmod/changefreq/priority values, URL host/path/length, canonical or indexing validation.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared population of supplied native sitemap files; roots are not automatically discovered.

Evidence
Base64/SHA-256 originals, declared URLs/dates and set plan; native-sitemap-files-v1 bounds.

Method
Count actually decompressed bytes and direct url/sitemap elements, including duplicates and entries without loc.

Acceptance criteria
Each file is at most52,428,800 bytes and50,000 entries; observed excess fails, partial reading without excess is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/ambiguous file, incomplete stream, unknown profile, reader bound, nested index or unqualified extension; independent violation retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied URL, date, origin and completeness, unauthenticated. No server observation.

Limitations
Supplied files only, no observed server or site completeness. No full XSD, lastmod/changefreq/priority values, URL host/path/length, canonical or indexing validation.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared population of supplied native sitemap files; roots are not automatically discovered.

Evidence
Base64/SHA-256 originals, declared URLs/dates and set plan; native-sitemap-files-v1 bounds.

Method
Bind each document to an exact declared URL and each index child to a complete leaf; roots and scope remain declared.

Acceptance criteria
All declared documents and branches are qualified; absence/ambiguity/outside-profile is inconclusive, never negative evidence about site sitemap use.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/ambiguous file, incomplete stream, unknown profile, reader bound, nested index or unqualified extension; independent violation retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied URL, date, origin and completeness, unauthenticated. No server observation.

Limitations
Supplied files only, no observed server or site completeness. No full XSD, lastmod/changefreq/priority values, URL host/path/length, canonical or indexing validation.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Important destinations and internal sources selected before captures, with dated original inventory and bound prior plan; incoming-document-links-v1.

Evidence
Original inventory, prior plan, HTTP/DOM originals, requested/final URLs, dates, destination status, raw href, anchor reference and per-destination diagnostics. DOM is required for surfaces that depend on it; an independent source witness suffices without DOM, without inventing one.

Method
For each destination, seek an a/href witness from a distinct qualified internal document: source HTML under two static hypotheses or provider-declared no-interaction DOM. Qualify each source, destination and surface separately.

Acceptance criteria
Pass when every destination has an independently qualified witness and a destination original. Fail when a destination has no witness across the complete qualified eligible population. Otherwise inconclusive; an independent fail survives other unknowns.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient plan/inventory/original, ambiguous population, unqualified surface, incoherent dates or absent runtime. A pair whose destination redirects back to its source remains inconclusive; another witness may suffice.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Inventory observed before the plan binding its digest, captures within the prior window; exact origins and no-interaction states supplied. Integrity does not authenticate evidence or simultaneity.

Limitations
Population and importance are supplied, not authenticated. No site completeness, observed acquisition or interaction, editorial value, Google visit, indexing or ranking. Bounded absence does not establish a site-wide orphan. Expected source content and soft404s are not assessed.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared essential destinations under the prior source-and-rendered strategy, on supplied captures.

Evidence
Original HTTP bytes, bound DOM v2 tree, prior plan and separate source/render diagnostics; provider-declared states.

Method
Read native source under both static scripting hypotheses; require their agreement.

Acceptance criteria
Every destination in the qualified stage: pass; established absence in complete inventory: fail; otherwise inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/incomplete/out-of-profile plan or stage, active base, ambiguous reading or missing runtime. Independent contradictions remain.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Prior plan, population, scenarios and completeness supplied; checked HTTP/DOM association but unauthenticated acquisition.

Limitations
C only within the declared strategy. No established visibility, interaction, editorial importance, authenticity, Google visit, indexing or ranking. Source presence is not a universal Google requirement.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared essential destinations under the prior source-and-rendered strategy, on supplied captures.

Evidence
Original HTTP bytes, bound DOM v2 tree, prior plan and separate source/render diagnostics; provider-declared states.

Method
Check each complete HTTP-bound tree and disclose repeated snapshots; scenarios are unauthenticated.

Acceptance criteria
Every destination in the qualified stage: pass; established absence in complete inventory: fail; otherwise inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/incomplete/out-of-profile plan or stage, active base, ambiguous reading or missing runtime. Independent contradictions remain.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Prior plan, population, scenarios and completeness supplied; checked HTTP/DOM association but unauthenticated acquisition.

Limitations
C only within the declared strategy. No established visibility, interaction, editorial importance, authenticity, Google visit, indexing or ranking. Source presence is not a universal Google requirement.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Population, roots, families and boundaries declared before captures; bounded supplied-graph-reconciliation-v1 profile.

Evidence
Dated fingerprinted original inventories, declared production/dependencies, prior plan, original HTTP/source/DOM, pairs and bounds, per-inventory dates and supplied reviews bound to exact dossiers.

Method
Read explicitly declared formats and lineage; ordered reference bound to plan, crawl following links from roots only, native CMS and sitemap with explicit optional dependency.

Acceptance criteria
Pass if all originals, dates, families and declarations are qualified; otherwise inconclusive. Matching lists do not establish completeness. Mixed or list seeding is inconclusive in this profile.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous, out-of-profile, misbound or out-of-window plan/original/surface/review; required runtime absent. Unknowns remain explicit and independent defects survive.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA; missing proof is inconclusive.

Assumptions
Exact origins/documents, prior plan, captures within at most24hours; unauthenticated production and no-interaction declarations.

Limitations
Declared graph only: no completeness, site-wide orphan, universal SEO depth, authenticated acquisition/reviews, observed interaction, indexing or ranking. HTTP200 does not verify expected content or soft404s. The reader does not adjudicate supplied rationale.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Population, roots, families and boundaries declared before captures; bounded supplied-graph-reconciliation-v1 profile.

Evidence
Dated fingerprinted original inventories, declared production/dependencies, prior plan, original HTTP/source/DOM, pairs and bounds, per-inventory dates and supplied reviews bound to exact dossiers.

Method
Read each pair from source under two hypotheses or qualified no-interaction DOM; compute lower/upper distances and counts of distinct incoming sources, excluding self-links.

Acceptance criteria
Pass if roots and every pair are qualified; otherwise inconclusive even if one depth is exact. A no-incoming candidate requires an upper degree of0. No universal depth threshold.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous, out-of-profile, misbound or out-of-window plan/original/surface/review; required runtime absent. Unknowns remain explicit and independent defects survive.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA; missing proof is inconclusive.

Assumptions
Exact origins/documents, prior plan, captures within at most24hours; unauthenticated production and no-interaction declarations.

Limitations
Declared graph only: no completeness, site-wide orphan, universal SEO depth, authenticated acquisition/reviews, observed interaction, indexing or ranking. HTTP200 does not verify expected content or soft404s. The reader does not adjudicate supplied rationale.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Population, roots, families and boundaries declared before captures; bounded supplied-graph-reconciliation-v1 profile.

Evidence
Dated fingerprinted original inventories, declared production/dependencies, prior plan, original HTTP/source/DOM, pairs and bounds, per-inventory dates and supplied reviews bound to exact dossiers.

Method
Derive subjects only from native measurements; check one review for each family, known difference, no-incoming candidate and unreachable document, bound to plan, originals, dates and measurements.

Acceptance criteria
Pass if every qualified subject has a correctly bound supplied explanation; fail if a supplied defect binds an evidenced subject; otherwise inconclusive. Reviews cannot cure unknown measurements and are never software-created human approval.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, ambiguous, out-of-profile, misbound or out-of-window plan/original/surface/review; required runtime absent. Unknowns remain explicit and independent defects survive.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA; missing proof is inconclusive.

Assumptions
Exact origins/documents, prior plan, captures within at most24hours; unauthenticated production and no-interaction declarations.

Limitations
Declared graph only: no completeness, site-wide orphan, universal SEO depth, authenticated acquisition/reviews, observed interaction, indexing or ranking. HTTP200 does not verify expected content or soft404s. The reader does not adjudicate supplied rationale.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS19 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: configuration, intent.

Method
Compare max_combinations, navigation and indexing in native url-pattern-config-v1 with each prior pattern; require review of the chosen bounds.

Acceptance criteria
Every supplied axis matches the selected finite plan. A conflicting value, including zero against a positive planned limit, fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing axis/configuration, non-integer bound outside1–128 or absent review: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS19 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: crawl, intent.

Method
Read url-crawl-v1, count distinct URLs and compare with the finite list and bound; retain the reasoned trap/cycle decision and its review.

Acceptance criteria
Observed URLs belong to the planned population, their count respects the bound and traps are explained. An outside URL or exceeded bound fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Incomplete supplied crawl, ambiguous identities, absent list or decision: inconclusive. A finite sample never proves whole-site finiteness.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS20 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: crawl, configuration, intent.

Method
Read the later capture and url-shape-config-v1. Check spaces/controls, backslashes, percent escapes, fragments and path case against prior choices; require human readability review.

Acceptance criteria
Configuration matches the plan and every URL satisfies its lexical axes. A qualified mismatch fails. No implicit case change or decoding.

When the result remains inconclusive
Unsupported URL/authority, unknown policy, missing capture or review: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS20 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: crawl, configuration, intent.

Method
Compare two ordered url-crawl-v1 captures with matching identities; every changed URL requires one reasoned before/after decision in the reviewed plan.

Acceptance criteria
URLs match at the two dates or their variation is explicitly decided and reviewed. An observed change without a decision fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
One date, reversed/equal dates, missing identity or review: inconclusive. Future stability remains unknown.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS21 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: search-console, logs, sitemap, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
Read supplied Google URL Inspection requests/responses for each selected URL, compare property, URL and family label; reconcile native urlset and TSV log export in their declared window. Require segmentation/attribution review.

Acceptance criteria
Native pieces are available and attributed to the selected family; sitemap membership agrees with the plan. Request, family-label or sitemap disagreement fails. Logs describe only their supplied window and client.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence, absent/error API result, unsupported label, uninterpretable logs or absent review: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS21 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: content, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
Read family-diagnosis-v1: diagnosis, hypothesis, prediction, falsification, measurement, decision, owner and due date for the same URL list. Check planned-versus-observed follow-up and bound review.

Acceptance criteria
Diagnostic axes are supplied and reviewed; causality=unproven and follow_up=planned-not-observed. Declaring causality from a label or correlation fails this profile.

When the result remains inconclusive
Hypothesis without falsification, misattributed family, claimed observed follow-up outside a separate method or missing judgment: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS22 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: hreflang, http, html, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
Read declared HTML, Link headers and XHTML urlsets separately; retain agreement of both static HTML hypotheses. Check each observed code against the frozen IANA registry subset and attribution to its planned destination.

Acceptance criteria
Observed codes belong to the documented language/script/region profile and destinations agree. An explicitly invalid code or conflicting destination fails; x-default qualifies only the reserved token.

When the result remains inconclusive
Deprecated code, exceptional region outside the subset, missing method/page, ambiguous HTML, relative annotation or absent review: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS22 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: hreflang, http, html, robots, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
For every selected destination compare indexing intent, direct HTTP200, HTTP/HTML directives, explicit self-canonical and same-origin robots.txt under the prior Google profile. Require source-scope review.

Acceptance criteria
Qualified signals permit and agree with the planned destination. A conflicting response, noindex, divergent canonical or evidenced robots denial fails despite other unknowns.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unqualified robots, absent canonical, partial trace, required rendering or absent review: inconclusive. Indexing permission is not indexing.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Cluster and primary channels declared before capture; bounded hreflang-reciprocity-v1 profile.

Evidence
Prior plan/expected mappings, selected channels, original HTTP requests/responses and hashes, dates, element/head-closure positions, static hypotheses, primary/secondary sets, exclusions and unknowns.

Method
Read native HTML or HTTP Link annotations from originals, preserve two HTML hypotheses and secondary channels, compare every code–URL pair to the prior cluster without unioning channels.

Acceptance criteria
Pass if all pages are qualified and include the expected set in their primary channel. Fail for established qualified absence, invalid primary-HTML placement or target conflict. Otherwise inconclusive; independent contradictions survive unknowns.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/ambiguous plan or original, unqualified chronology/channel, source recovery outside admitted boundary, language/URL outside closed admission, unplanned outside annotation or missing required runtime.

Non-applicability
No automatic NA; an empty plan does not establish non-applicability.

Assumptions
Prior plan, at most24-hour window, HTTP200 requested=final without redirects, exact absolute HTTP(S) URLs. Two static HTML hypotheses, no script execution.

Limitations
Supplied cluster and primary mode declarations: no capture authenticity, site completeness, TS22 language validity, indexability/canonical, TS24 x-default suitability, translation, executed JavaScript or Google processing. Relevant supplied sitemap/DOM channels remain outside this profile.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Group and x-default policy supplied before capture; bounded xdefault-role-v1 profile.

Evidence
Prior policy/context, original HTTP and hashes, primary/secondary observations, original bound reviews, dates and unknowns.

Method
Read native HTML/HTTP Link observations; check destination, motivated context, captured availability and bound supplied role review; retain unknowns and contested reviews.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires every surface qualified, an unambiguous expected target, its original200 and bound consistent review. Fail for qualified required-primary absence, any qualified target conflicting with the unique policy destination, including among multiple declarations, attributable404/410, contradicted URL distinctness or one bound defect review. Otherwise inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unqualified plan, context, original or review; unqualified declarations or divergent hypotheses without an independent contradiction, contested reviews, status outside200/404/410, relevant unexamined channel or missing required runtime.

Non-applicability
No native NA or manual override; historical manual dossiers stay separate, optional absence is inconclusive.

Assumptions
Prior plan and one motivated context; one non-redirect GET per original, window<=24h, two static HTML hypotheses. Supplied review, unauthenticated author.

Limitations
Supplied scope, no representative audience or authenticated semantic role; HTTP200 does not detect error templates/soft404s. No translation, Google visit, indexing, completeness or global conformity.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Critical items and stage policies declared before capture, profile critical-stage-presence-v1.

Evidence
Prior plan, HTTP/DOM originals, fingerprints, conditions, per-item/stage values, actually supplied reviews and dates.

Method
Check five role dispositions, then items in static source hypotheses and planned rendered states; retain originals, exclusions and bound supplied reviews.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires motivated population, five exact decisions and a prior bound supported review. Bound contradiction review: fail. Missing, unbound or unknown review: inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing or invalid plan/capture/review, unsupported role, conflicting readings, unqualified rendered context, extra/duplicate states, exceeded bounds. An independent failure remains fail. Draft.44 / reader3: supplied TS25 review fields reviewer, assistance and reason are each limited to8192 raw UTF8 bytes before strip or normalization; each entire review object, including additional fields, to32768 compact UTF8 JSON bytes. Admission checks every supplied review, including unused ones. An overrun is technical refusal before publication, never public C or NT; exact originals are not rewritten. Each native rule diagnostic is bounded to4MiB of sorted compact UTF8 JSON, including A01 and error returns. Overflow produces an explicitly incomplete compact diagnostic retaining an independently established fail, otherwise inconclusive; never pass. Transport refuses that marker and also caps the sum of actual serialized TS25 observation artifacts per target at4MiB (UTF8 JSON indent2, trailing newline), for requested rules. Individual maxima do not guarantee that every combination satisfies aggregate bounds. Other controls and the shared validator are unchanged.

Non-applicability
No native NA; motivated out-of-scope roles retained, never equivalent to control NA.

Assumptions
1–32 items,0–16 prior states, window<=24h, HTTP<=30s; five explicit roles. Two HTML hypotheses must agree; required states combine with qualified-failure precedence. Supplied review, no authentication.

Limitations
Declared scope only, static hypotheses without execution; unauthenticated reviews and attribution. No inferred Google rendering, CSS visibility, truth, structured validity, indexing or global conformity.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Critical items and stage policies declared before capture, profile critical-stage-presence-v1.

Evidence
Prior plan, HTTP/DOM originals, fingerprints, conditions, per-item/stage values, actually supplied reviews and dates.

Method
Check five role dispositions, then items in static source hypotheses and planned rendered states; retain originals, exclusions and bound supplied reviews.

Acceptance criteria
Pass requires all items present under their policy and qualified state coverage. Independently qualified absence: fail despite another unknown. Otherwise inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing or invalid plan/capture/review, unsupported role, conflicting readings, unqualified rendered context, extra/duplicate states, exceeded bounds. An independent failure remains fail. A non-object render container remains unknown; it does not erase an independently required qualified source absence. Draft.44 / reader3: supplied TS25 review fields reviewer, assistance and reason are each limited to8192 raw UTF8 bytes before strip or normalization; each entire review object, including additional fields, to32768 compact UTF8 JSON bytes. Admission checks every supplied review, including unused ones. An overrun is technical refusal before publication, never public C or NT; exact originals are not rewritten. Each native rule diagnostic is bounded to4MiB of sorted compact UTF8 JSON, including A01 and error returns. Overflow produces an explicitly incomplete compact diagnostic retaining an independently established fail, otherwise inconclusive; never pass. Transport refuses that marker and also caps the sum of actual serialized TS25 observation artifacts per target at4MiB (UTF8 JSON indent2, trailing newline), for requested rules. Individual maxima do not guarantee that every combination satisfies aggregate bounds. Other controls and the shared validator are unchanged.

Non-applicability
No native NA; motivated out-of-scope roles retained, never equivalent to control NA.

Assumptions
1–32 items,0–16 prior states, window<=24h, HTTP<=30s; five explicit roles. Two HTML hypotheses must agree; required states combine with qualified-failure precedence. Supplied review, no authentication.

Limitations
Declared scope only, static hypotheses without execution; unauthenticated reviews and attribution. No inferred Google rendering, CSS visibility, truth, structured validity, indexing or global conformity.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS26 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, robots, html, intent.

Method
For each selected critical resource compare direct HTTP200, same-origin robots and intersection of HTTP CSP policies from the HTTPS document. Retain complete source to exclude unqualified meta CSP.

Acceptance criteria
A qualified HTTP error, robots denial or CSP denial fails independently of other gaps.

When the result remains inconclusive
Absent inventory, missing robots, unsupported CSP directive, nonce, meta CSP, ambiguous source or absent review: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS26 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: render, http, intent.

Method
Read a supplied bounded HAR export, bind its document response to native HTTP bytes, then check every critical resource. Retain dated HAR-bound console and criticality review.

Acceptance criteria
Selected resources have2xx responses without supplied network error. Unclassified console errors remain NT; native network failure remains NC.

When the result remains inconclusive
Incomplete HAR, omitted body, unattributed context/session, missing console or unqualified error: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS27 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, render, intent.

Method
Check four supplied states in direct, refresh, back, forward order: session, sequence, time, URL, server-response binding and status.

Acceptance criteria
Every state retains its route URL and intended200 source. A qualified conflicting URL or status fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/ambiguous state, action, binding, session or order; uncollected frame/shadow surface: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS27 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, render, intent.

Method
Within the same qualified states compare literal IDs, essential text and link destinations with the plan, then one explicit head canonical. Require operation review.

Acceptance criteria
States retain their intended content and signals. Absence on a complete surface, differing content or conflicting canonical fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Partial state, hidden context, ambiguous ID, differing HTML hypotheses or absent review: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS28 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, render, intent.

Method
Compare source and supplied serialization: title, language, declared main landmark, ordered headings, links and labels. H1 count follows the plan.

Acceptance criteria
Structures agree with the prior plan; qualified structural conflicts fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Absent source/DOM, undeclared language, ambiguous tree or unqualified visual context: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS28 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, render, intent.

Method
Reuse attributed structural facts and require a distinct bound review of title/language adequacy, hierarchy, main subject, navigation and labels in declared use.

Acceptance criteria
Facts are qualified and a reasoned judgment supports meaning and use; evidenced contradiction fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Parser output alone, an unbound review or insufficient originals are not enough: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS29 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, render, intent.

Method
Read source and a supplied state explicitly marked scripts-blocked; compare every essential content/link or the prior fallback within that same state. Require action and operation review.

Acceptance criteria
All main expectations or all tested fallback expectations are supported. Qualified failures of both main and fallback fail; text alone does not establish function.

When the result remains inconclusive
Normal condition, partial capture, merely described fallback, hidden context or missing review: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS29 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, render, intent.

Method
Apply the same examination in an explicitly styles-degraded state with action observations and a bound review. Script disabling does not qualify this scenario.

Acceptance criteria
Essential functions or tested fallback remain supported in this distinct scenario.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing degraded-style scenario, fallback evidence or attributed judgment: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS30 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md. Amendment: docs/render-transport-prerequisites-v2.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, content, intent.

Method
Read native title, description, H1, og:title, og:description for each page. Compare prior values and duplicates among selected pages; require a prior decision for each intentional duplicate. Separately qualify H1 and descendant-text flags; preserve native contradictions in other fields.

Acceptance criteria
Values and multiplicity agree; each observed duplicate has one reasoned decision. The corpus is limited to supplied pages.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing source, omitted field policy, ambiguous parse or missing review: NT. null permits only an explicitly absent optional field. Hidden/unqualified H1 or descendant text: NT, without manufacturing absence.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS30 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md. Amendment: docs/render-transport-prerequisites-v2.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: html, content, intent.

Method
Reconcile native metadata and identified main content; require a distinct review of promise, meaning and relevant visibility. Separately qualify H1 and descendant-text flags; preserve native contradictions in other fields.

Acceptance criteria
Facts agree with the plan and the bound editorial review supports them; qualified native or human contradiction fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Unqualified required source/rendering, hidden content, meaning without review or unbound judgment: NT. Hidden/unqualified H1 or descendant text: NT, without manufacturing absence.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page with JSON-LD; planned source and DOM profile.

Evidence
Native HTTP, attributed trees, supplied contexts/guidance, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-visible-content-v1 contract.

Method
Qualify the plan, dated guidance and bound prior scope/source-base/guidance review.

Acceptance criteria
Three supported judgments; bound contradiction fails, missing or unknown review is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Gaps, bounds, missing context/runtime, ambiguous reading, empty graph, notice or unknown review; independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence in a bounded profile does not establish NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, bases, dates, visible content and judgments; hashes do not authenticate.

Limitations
JSON-LD and documentary review of the selected page; no Schema.org vocabulary validation, authenticated truth/visibility, rich result, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page with JSON-LD; planned source and DOM profile.

Evidence
Native HTTP, attributed trees, supplied contexts/guidance, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-visible-content-v1 contract.

Method
Recompute exact scripts under both source hypotheses and all planned DOM states using supplied contexts.

Acceptance criteria
Complete readings and at least one nonempty graph without notices; attributed invalid JSON fails, other limits are inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Gaps, bounds, missing context/runtime, ambiguous reading, empty graph, notice or unknown review; independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence in a bounded profile does not establish NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, bases, dates, visible content and judgments; hashes do not authenticate.

Limitations
JSON-LD and documentary review of the selected page; no Schema.org vocabulary validation, authenticated truth/visibility, rich result, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page with JSON-LD; planned source and DOM profile.

Evidence
Native HTTP, attributed trees, supplied contexts/guidance, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-visible-content-v1 contract.

Method
Bind supplied content and every flattened node to complete reviews covering visibility, type, all properties and absence of fabrication.

Acceptance criteria
Exact population and supported qualifications; bound supplied contradiction fails, gaps or unknowns are inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Gaps, bounds, missing context/runtime, ambiguous reading, empty graph, notice or unknown review; independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence in a bounded profile does not establish NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, bases, dates, visible content and judgments; hashes do not authenticate.

Limitations
JSON-LD and documentary review of the selected page; no Schema.org vocabulary validation, authenticated truth/visibility, rich result, indexing or ranking.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared corpus of 2–16 JSON-LD exports using identifiers.

Evidence
Prior registry, native exports, local contexts, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-identity-corpus-v1 contract.

Method
Check distinct entities, plan and bound prior population/mapping/reference review.

Acceptance criteria
Collision-free registry and three supported judgments; distinct-entity collision fails even with absent review.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence, review, runtime or context; empty/named graph, notice or unqualified reference/ID. Independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No NA in this bounded profile.

Assumptions
Declared/reviewed origin, completeness, bases, dates and mappings; not authenticated.

Limitations
Supplied corpus coherence, no temporal stability, real identity, page collection, cross-document merging or Google guarantee.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared corpus of 2–16 JSON-LD exports using identifiers.

Evidence
Prior registry, native exports, local contexts, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-identity-corpus-v1 contract.

Method
Recompute native exports independently and compare defined IRIs with the registry; inventory references and scope.

Acceptance criteria
Required IRIs defined and scope/references qualified; required absence from a complete nonempty graph fails, gaps or ambiguity are inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence, review, runtime or context; empty/named graph, notice or unqualified reference/ID. Independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No NA in this bounded profile.

Assumptions
Declared/reviewed origin, completeness, bases, dates and mappings; not authenticated.

Limitations
Supplied corpus coherence, no temporal stability, real identity, page collection, cross-document merging or Google guarantee.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared corpus of 2–16 JSON-LD exports using identifiers.

Evidence
Prior registry, native exports, local contexts, recomputed graphs and bound reviews; jsonld-identity-corpus-v1 contract.

Method
Bind each export and recomputed node to mapping, repetition/duplicate and reference-meaning reviews.

Acceptance criteria
Exact coverage and supported judgments; bound contradiction fails, incomplete/unknown review is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence, review, runtime or context; empty/named graph, notice or unqualified reference/ID. Independent contradictions preserved.

Non-applicability
No NA in this bounded profile.

Assumptions
Declared/reviewed origin, completeness, bases, dates and mappings; not authenticated.

Limitations
Supplied corpus coherence, no temporal stability, real identity, page collection, cross-document merging or Google guarantee.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page, bound HTTP/DOM JSON-LD captures and separate indexed APIv1 snapshot.

Evidence
Plan, native captures, pinned vocabulary30.1, original API outputs and bound reviews; jsonld-validation-layers-v1 contract.

Method
Check prior plan, dated feature guidance and bound scope/support/separation review.

Acceptance criteria
Three supported qualifications; reasoned contradiction fails, absence/unknown is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence/review/runtime, unattributed layer, unknown format/severity or undetected feature; independent errors retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied/reviewed origin, dates and completeness, not authenticated; Google backend version unexposed.

Limitations
Schema.org names only; separate snapshots, no inferred live test, current eligibility, display or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page, bound HTTP/DOM JSON-LD captures and separate indexed APIv1 snapshot.

Evidence
Plan, native captures, pinned vocabulary30.1, original API outputs and bound reviews; jsonld-validation-layers-v1 contract.

Method
Reprocess source/DOM with TS31 readers; compare classes/properties with complete Schema.org30.1, equivalent HTTP/HTTPS namespaces.

Acceptance criteria
Attributed typed graphs without syntax error, missing term or contradictory role; unknowns remain distinct.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence/review/runtime, unattributed layer, unknown format/severity or undetected feature; independent errors retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied/reviewed origin, dates and completeness, not authenticated; Google backend version unexposed.

Limitations
Schema.org names only; separate snapshots, no inferred live test, current eligibility, display or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected page, bound HTTP/DOM JSON-LD captures and separate indexed APIv1 snapshot.

Evidence
Plan, native captures, pinned vocabulary30.1, original API outputs and bound reviews; jsonld-validation-layers-v1 contract.

Method
Read all APIv1 messages, severities and features; bind an exact review to the indexed response, separate from current captures.

Acceptance criteria
No ERROR/FAIL; exact coverage and qualifications. Error, omission or downgrade fails even when documented; technical failure is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing evidence/review/runtime, unattributed layer, unknown format/severity or undetected feature; independent errors retained.

Non-applicability
No NA in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied/reviewed origin, dates and completeness, not authenticated; Google backend version unexposed.

Limitations
Schema.org names only; separate snapshots, no inferred live test, current eligibility, display or indexing.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared performance scope for this control and qualified reading profile.

Evidence
Original JSON with source/date/hash; plan and supplied review when required, diagnostics and limits under docs/performance-evidence.md.

Method
Identify source, request/returned key, URL/origin, device, period and population under performance-evidence-v1. No implicit scope fallback.

Acceptance criteria
Cohort matches the plan with retained dates/provenance. Explicit lab-for-field substitution fails; a different or old cohort remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient source/plan/dates/measures; unsupported format/profile, scope mismatch, exceeded bounds or missing review under the contract. Absence never becomes C or NA.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption; whole-control non-applicability requires its own evidence.

Assumptions
Supplied data/reviews are not authenticated. Plan precedes assessment and lab runs; a historical cohort is not preregistration.

Limitations
C describes documentation, not good performance. No display/ranking, demonstrated cause, automatic human review or global conformity. Replay performs no new measurement.

Protocol assessment mode : automatic. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared performance scope for this control and qualified reading profile.

Evidence
Original JSON with source/date/hash; plan and supplied review when required, diagnostics and limits under docs/performance-evidence.md.

Method
Read LCP/INP/CLS p75 in native units and compare exactly with cited thresholds, without relabeling FID/TBT. Retain poor values and unknowns.

Acceptance criteria
All three measures are classified correctly. A bound classification contradicting p75 fails; correctly documented poor performance passes.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient source/plan/dates/measures; unsupported format/profile, scope mismatch, exceeded bounds or missing review under the contract. Absence never becomes C or NA.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption; whole-control non-applicability requires its own evidence.

Assumptions
Supplied data/reviews are not authenticated. Plan precedes assessment and lab runs; a historical cohort is not preregistration.

Limitations
C describes documentation, not good performance. No display/ranking, demonstrated cause, automatic human review or global conformity. Replay performs no new measurement.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared performance scope for this control and qualified reading profile.

Evidence
Original JSON with source/date/hash; plan and supplied review when required, diagnostics and limits under docs/performance-evidence.md.

Method
Retain supplied review, author, provenance, date, source hash and decision for each metric; verify binding without fabricating judgment.

Acceptance criteria
Each metric retains its class, reason and action. A contradictory class fails. Missing/incomplete/unbound review is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient source/plan/dates/measures; unsupported format/profile, scope mismatch, exceeded bounds or missing review under the contract. Absence never becomes C or NA.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption; whole-control non-applicability requires its own evidence.

Assumptions
Supplied data/reviews are not authenticated. Plan precedes assessment and lab runs; a historical cohort is not preregistration.

Limitations
C describes documentation, not good performance. No display/ranking, demonstrated cause, automatic human review or global conformity. Replay performs no new measurement.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared performance scope for this control and qualified reading profile.

Evidence
Original JSON with source/date/hash; plan and supplied review when required, diagnostics and limits under docs/performance-evidence.md.

Method
Retain a planned series of 2–10 distinct Lighthouse reports, dates, URLs, tool/version, client, device, throttling, native measures and spread.

Acceptance criteria
Series matches planned context/count. URL contrary to plan fails; different context, missing measure or runtime error remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient source/plan/dates/measures; unsupported format/profile, scope mismatch, exceeded bounds or missing review under the contract. Absence never becomes C or NA.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption; whole-control non-applicability requires its own evidence.

Assumptions
Supplied data/reviews are not authenticated. Plan precedes assessment and lab runs; a historical cohort is not preregistration.

Limitations
C describes documentation, not good performance. No display/ranking, demonstrated cause, automatic human review or global conformity. Replay performs no new measurement.

Protocol assessment mode : manual. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Declared performance scope for this control and qualified reading profile.

Evidence
Original JSON with source/date/hash; plan and supplied review when required, diagnostics and limits under docs/performance-evidence.md.

Method
Bind a supplied review to ordered reports, measured metrics, a hypothesis and next measurement. Separate laboratory, INP and field results.

Acceptance criteria
Bound review names hypothesis, metrics and action without field substitution. Explicit lab/CWV or TBT/INP substitution fails; absent review is inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Insufficient source/plan/dates/measures; unsupported format/profile, scope mismatch, exceeded bounds or missing review under the contract. Absence never becomes C or NA.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption; whole-control non-applicability requires its own evidence.

Assumptions
Supplied data/reviews are not authenticated. Plan precedes assessment and lab runs; a historical cohort is not preregistration.

Limitations
C describes documentation, not good performance. No display/ranking, demonstrated cause, automatic human review or global conformity. Replay performs no new measurement.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected release whose dated follow-up is assessed.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, deployment receipt, native API and supplied normalized logs; release-monitoring-v1 contract.

Method
Qualify the bound plan before baseline, receipt identities and baseline/deployment order.

Acceptance criteria
Supported plan, matching identity and baseline recorded before deployment; explicit contradiction fails, gaps remain inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Future stage, missing evidence, errors, unknown values, incomplete logs or invalid bindings; preserve independent contradictions.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence or delay never establishes NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, dates, layer and judgments; hashes alone authenticate nothing.

Limitations
Documentary C for selected baseline/D+1/D+7/D+30; no causality, authenticated Google visit, indexing or global coverage.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected release whose dated follow-up is assessed.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, deployment receipt, native API and supplied normalized logs; release-monitoring-v1 contract.

Method
Read baseline/d1/d7/d30, qualify TS08-A02 API and exact-window log inventories.

Acceptance criteria
All four stages reached, complete attributed evidence within bounds; future/absence/error remains inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Future stage, missing evidence, errors, unknown values, incomplete logs or invalid bindings; preserve independent contradictions.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence or delay never establishes NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, dates, layer and judgments; hashes alone authenticate nothing.

Limitations
Documentary C for selected baseline/D+1/D+7/D+30; no causality, authenticated Google visit, indexing or global coverage.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Selected release whose dated follow-up is assessed.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, deployment receipt, native API and supplied normalized logs; release-monitoring-v1 contract.

Method
Compare claims to known values, retain changes without causality and qualify supplied reviews/decisions.

Acceptance criteria
Faithful claims, supported reviews and complete cycle; false known claim or closure before a future stage fails; other gaps inconclusive.

When the result remains inconclusive
Future stage, missing evidence, errors, unknown values, incomplete logs or invalid bindings; preserve independent contradictions.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption; absence or delay never establishes NA.

Assumptions
Supplied scope, dates, layer and judgments; hashes alone authenticate nothing.

Limitations
Documentary C for selected baseline/D+1/D+7/D+30; no causality, authenticated Google visit, indexing or global coverage.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS37 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: tls, intent.

Method
Recheck supplied public PEMs with offline OpenSSL3: chain, server purpose, DNS host, supplied time and explicit supplied roots. Disable implicit stores; retain version and diagnostic.

Acceptance criteria
Profile verification succeeds under supplied roots. A supported X509 error, including expiry or wrong host, fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing OpenSSL3, unusable PEM, misattributed capture, absent roots or unqualified error code: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS37 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, configuration, intent.

Method
Follow the supplied HTTP chain to HTTPS without downgrade, check direct200 response, compare HSTS configuration and header with planned enablement, max-age, subdomains, scope, owner and rationale.

Acceptance criteria
Chains and HSTS decision agree; HSTS may be explicitly disabled. No preload requirement.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing chain/configuration, ambiguous header, absent scope or decision: NT.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Prior finite TS37 population under render-transport-v1; see docs/render-transport-evidence.md. Amendment: docs/render-transport-prerequisites-v2.md.

Evidence
Exact originals, plan and dates/context, fingerprints, diagnostics and reasoned review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, render, intent.

Method
Bind HAR and console to the HTTPS document; inspect observed requests and source embedded URLs. The strict profile requires HTTPS for these resources even when a browser might upgrade them. With unqualified base href, a relative URL stays NT; examine absolute URLs independently despite CSS/srcset or another unknown scheme.

Acceptance criteria
No HTTP URL observed on these surfaces; dynamic-coverage review retained. An observed native HTTP URL fails despite another gap.

When the result remains inconclusive
Truncated HAR, missing body, unqualified CSS/srcset, incomplete context or absent review: NT. Unqualified relative resolution with base href: NT; an independent HTTP contradiction stays NC.

Non-applicability
No atomic NA. Empty population or claimed absent domain without evidence remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated provenance, inventory, browser state, conditions and judgment; two static HTML readings are not two navigations. TLS trust depends on supplied roots.

Limitations
No real audit inferred from synthetic cases. No indexing, ranking, global conformity, accessibility certification, exhaustive security or universal browser trust. Reviews may be wrong and captures may omit states.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS38 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: http, html, content, intent.

Method
Require reviewed equivalence and read every native trajectory: one hop from each variant, direct200 preferred response, HTTP/HTML canonical pointing to it.

Acceptance criteria
Every variant converges in one hop and every qualified canonical agrees. Declared merging of distinct resources or native disagreement fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing trace/canonical, undecided equivalence or necessary rendering: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS38 items; url-policy-v1 profile defined in docs/url-policy-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, original bytes and SHA-256, dates/context, atomic observations, reasoned human review bound to the entire dossier. Kinds: sitemap, html, crawl, content, intent.

Method
Read the selected complete native urlset and every planned link source. Require the preference in that sitemap, no nonpreferred variant in sitemap/links, and equivalence/scope review.

Acceptance criteria
Sitemap and scoped links agree with the preference; disagreement or merging distinct pages fails. Zero links remains an observation of the complete supplied corpus.

When the result remains inconclusive
XML index, truncated file, missing link source, ambiguous population/review: inconclusive; no global absence inferred.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption in this profile. Empty population or absent evidence: NT, never automatic NA.

Assumptions
Supplied population and provenance; review assumes scope sufficiency and business judgment. Content, imported verdicts or hashes never prove authenticity.

Limitations
Bounded offline reading, without collection, browser execution, generated human judgment or real audit. Reviewed source scope only; no site completeness, indexing, ranking or causality inferred.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Delivery varying by region, cache, device or negotiation.

Evidence
Configuration, prior matrix, native HTTP, rendered states or positive exemptions, bound reviews and cache journals where tested. Googlebot access policy is qualified separately from test-client requests; no actual visit inferred.

Method
Check window, cells, mechanisms, retained configuration and bound prior review, including representativeness and Googlebot access policy.

Acceptance criteria
Configuration and matrix qualified by supported review; documented rejection = fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, late or unbound configuration/review; unqualified matrix minimum or mechanism.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied intent, context and source/review qualifications; their truth remains to verify.

Limitations
First bounded profile with one canonical member per cell and reuse without transformation. Supplied reviews, sources, regions, clocks and logs are not authenticated; no general cache simulation. Two points do not cover all POPs/routes, and C does not establish actual Googlebot access.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Delivery varying by region, cache, device or negotiation.

Evidence
Configuration, prior matrix, native HTTP, rendered states or positive exemptions, bound reviews and cache journals where tested. Googlebot access policy is qualified separately from test-client requests; no actual visit inferred.

Method
Compare status/final URL, recalculate TS07-A01/A02/A03 and TS10-A01, then compare language/content/accessibility through bound reviews; retain each unknown.

Acceptance criteria
All cells follow policy; positive rendering exemption retained. Any attributable contradiction fails despite other unknowns.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing cell, source, rendering, review or profile; incomplete body, unbound context or unknown semantics.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied intent, context and source/review qualifications; their truth remains to verify.

Limitations
First bounded profile with one canonical member per cell and reuse without transformation. Supplied reviews, sources, regions, clocks and logs are not authenticated; no general cache simulation. Two points do not cover all POPs/routes, and C does not establish actual Googlebot access.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Delivery varying by region, cache, device or negotiation.

Evidence
Configuration, prior matrix, native HTTP, rendered states or positive exemptions, bound reviews and cache journals where tested. Googlebot access policy is qualified separately from test-client requests; no actual visit inferred.

Method
Qualify contexts/mechanisms through bound sources; for cache, link stored entry, served request, layer, clock, Vary and freshness review.

Acceptance criteria
Consistent attribution and policy over all cells/checks; attributed reuse incompatible with Vary or policy fails. A test is not an operator visit.

When the result remains inconclusive
Unqualified region, source, journal, linkage or freshness; Age/HIT, User-Agent, sequence or ETag alone are insufficient.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied intent, context and source/review qualifications; their truth remains to verify.

Limitations
First bounded profile with one canonical member per cell and reuse without transformation. Supplied reviews, sources, regions, clocks and logs are not authenticated; no general cache simulation. Two points do not cover all POPs/routes, and C does not establish actual Googlebot access.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS40 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: hreflang, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
Inventory methods before capture; read every method/page independently and check the complete expected group including self-reference. A secondary method does not complete a partial primary one.

Acceptance criteria
Each complete method contains the expected mappings. Demonstrated omission on a complete surface or a conflicting destination fails; one chosen method is allowed.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing capture/method, truncated/index XML, published method omitted from plan, outside-group mapping or absent review: inconclusive.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Explicitly selected TS40 families or clusters; indexing-locale-v1, docs/indexing-locale-evidence.md.

Evidence
Prior plan, exact originals, fingerprints, dates/context, observations and reasoned review bound to the whole dossier. Minimum kinds: hreflang, intent. Conditional native evidence follows declared methods.

Method
Compare qualified mappings across methods/pages without merging their sets. Retain independent destination conflicts even when a third method is missing; compare set equality when both are complete.

Acceptance criteria
Complete methods and pages agree. One complete method is allowed. A native conflict or differing complete sets fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Comparison without a qualified surface, partial capture, missing method or absent review: inconclusive unless an independent contradiction is established.

Non-applicability
No atomic exemption. Empty population, unassessed Google or an unobserved cluster remains NT in this profile.

Assumptions
Supplied unauthenticated scope, provenance, segmentation and reviews. Two static HTML hypotheses are not two navigations. Frozen codes do not predict engine processing.

Limitations
Offline reading of supplied evidence; no authenticated Google origin, human identity or crawler visit; no current index state, causality, translation quality, targeting or global conformity established.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Deployments subject to project-defined SEO invariants.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, identified command/environment, native input/output receipts, process exit codes, JSONL journal and artifacts around application.

Method
Check the window, attempts, matrix, strict policy and bound representativeness review before the window.

Acceptance criteria
Complete plan and supported review; explicit bound rejection = fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, unbound, late or incomplete plan/review; unsupported profile, threshold or scope.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied population, comparable context, artifact identities and reviews; their truth remains to qualify.

Limitations
First strict native TSEP profile without overrides; supplied commands are never executed. Reviews, completeness, clocks and runner are supplied, not authenticated. C qualifies the declared process, not global SEO health, causality or remote CI.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Deployments subject to project-defined SEO invariants.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, identified command/environment, native input/output receipts, process exit codes, JSONL journal and artifacts around application.

Method
Recalculate retained inputs; check matrix, artifacts, command, triggers and chronology without executing argv.

Acceptance criteria
Exact population and faithful outputs including retained unknowns; conclusive binding or output contradiction = fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing receipt, cell, review, event or runtime; ambiguous journal, extra execution or differing inconclusive recalculation.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied population, comparable context, artifact identities and reviews; their truth remains to qualify.

Limitations
First strict native TSEP profile without overrides; supplied commands are never executed. Reviews, completeness, clocks and runner are supplied, not authenticated. C qualifies the declared process, not global SEO health, causality or remote CI.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Deployments subject to project-defined SEO invariants.

Evidence
Bound plan/reviews, identified command/environment, native input/output receipts, process exit codes, JSONL journal and artifacts around application.

Method
Check prior negative failure, distinct pass/fail/inconclusive exit codes and explicit block/apply or accept/hold event.

Acceptance criteria
Effective negative rehearsal and phase-correct responses; masked failure/unknown, wrong action or observed override = fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unqualified rehearsal, process exit, binding or action; journal absence cannot establish a block.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied population, comparable context, artifact identities and reviews; their truth remains to qualify.

Limitations
First strict native TSEP profile without overrides; supplied commands are never executed. Reviews, completeness, clocks and runner are supplied, not authenticated. C qualifies the declared process, not global SEO health, causality or remote CI.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each target URL and mechanism of the previously declared policy.

Evidence
Inputs, dates, hashes and detailed findings under docs/agent-usage-policy.md.

Method
Bind operator, actor, token, mechanism and purposes to dated UTF-8 sources; check hashes and supplied bound review.

Acceptance criteria
Every mapping has a complete, dated, bound supported review with explicit robots applicability. A bound contradiction fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, stale or ambiguous source; missing hash, binding, completeness or review.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory; declared source interpretation and personal authority, without automatic authentication.

Limitations
Supplied scope and bounded robots profile; no automatic registry. Sources, reviews and decisions are unauthenticated; no inferred visit, real identity, operator compliance, indexing or citation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each target URL and mechanism of the previously declared policy.

Evidence
Inputs, dates, hashes and detailed findings under docs/agent-usage-policy.md.

Method
Check every reasoned choice, the separate declared owner/delegate decision and its plan binding; retain any arbitration of coupled purposes.

Acceptance criteria
Each mechanism/purpose pair has a choice and reason; the owner accepts the plan and its exact tradeoffs. A bound rejection fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/undeclared author, unbound decision, inconsistent dates, incomplete choice or arbitration.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory; declared source interpretation and personal authority, without automatic authentication.

Limitations
Supplied scope and bounded robots profile; no automatic registry. Sources, reviews and decisions are unauthenticated; no inferred visit, real identity, operator compliance, indexing or citation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each target URL and mechanism of the previously declared policy.

Evidence
Inputs, dates, hashes and detailed findings under docs/agent-usage-policy.md.

Method
Group tokens case-insensitively, qualify mappings and compare Allow/Disallow with the effective choice; retain reading, tradeoffs, contradictions and unknowns.

Acceptance criteria
For each qualified group, the attributable client robots 200 policy matches the accepted choice. Any independent contradiction fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Opposing purposes without arbitration, unsupported mechanism, ignored field or missing HTTP/source/decision evidence; other robots profiles unqualified.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory; declared source interpretation and personal authority, without automatic authentication.

Limitations
Supplied scope and bounded robots profile; no automatic registry. Sources, reviews and decisions are unauthenticated; no inferred visit, real identity, operator compliance, indexing or citation.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each URL and HTTP client within the previously declared test scope.

Evidence
Evidence, dates, bindings and observations under docs/agent-access-evidence.md.

Method
Read sources and bound review; check the dated HTTP chain then planned test-client response/body.

Acceptance criteria
Reviewed documentation and response agree with the test plan; retain independent contradictions despite other missing evidence.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing client/source/review, incomplete chain, absent test expectation or required body reference.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied sources, context, log quality and reviews; test scope limited to its client.

Limitations
First profile: assessor-initiated test client; no actual visit, identity, security or operator access inferred. Sources, logs, reviews and receipt are unauthenticated.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each URL and HTTP client within the previously declared test scope.

Evidence
Evidence, dates, bindings and observations under docs/agent-access-evidence.md.

Method
Check export and layer/ID/cache/clock review, then identify each unique in-window line before literal comparison.

Acceptance criteria
Every hop has an attributed record with matching method, URL, client and status; any qualified difference fails despite another missing hop.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing logs, client-supplied/reused ID, duplicate, other layer, unknown format or insufficient window/review.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied sources, context, log quality and reviews; test scope limited to its client.

Limitations
First profile: assessor-initiated test client; no actual visit, identity, security or operator access inferred. Sources, logs, reviews and receipt are unauthenticated.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Each URL and HTTP client within the previously declared test scope.

Evidence
Evidence, dates, bindings and observations under docs/agent-access-evidence.md.

Method
Check bound execution receipt and supplied attribution; distinguish assessor test from an operator visit.

Acceptance criteria
Assessor-test origin, not-verified operator identity and no real-visit claim; any bound contrary claim fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing receipt/command/attribution, inconsistent dates, absent binding or ambiguous identity status.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied sources, context, log quality and reviews; test scope limited to its client.

Limitations
First profile: assessor-initiated test client; no actual visit, identity, security or operator access inferred. Sources, logs, reviews and receipt are unauthenticated.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Content intended for declared automated consumers.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, complete HTTP chains, raw HTML/JSON, attributed rendered tree and bound context reviews.

Method
Check inventory, no-JS client, planned states/resources and bound review predating captures.

Acceptance criteria
Complete scope supported by review; bound rejection = fail.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing, late, unbound or incomplete plan/review, or different reference capability.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory, expected references, context and reviews; scope fixed before capture, unauthenticated evidence.

Limitations
First bounded HTML/JSON profile, optional Node and supplied rendered evidence; no authenticated CSS visibility, truth, reviewer identity, ingestion or citation. Authored DOM explicitly synthetic.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Content intended for declared automated consumers.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, complete HTTP chains, raw HTML/JSON, attributed rendered tree and bound context reviews.

Method
Check the prior path, explicit resource link if needed, anonymous HTTP and all critical elements.

Acceptance criteria
Expected destination/response and present elements; any qualified denial, wrong path or absence fails.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing capture, unsupported format/runtime/link/context or incomplete unqualified reading.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory, expected references, context and reviews; scope fixed before capture, unauthenticated evidence.

Limitations
First bounded HTML/JSON profile, optional Node and supplied rendered evidence; no authenticated CSS visibility, truth, reviewer identity, ingestion or citation. Authored DOM explicitly synthetic.

Protocol assessment mode : assisted, with supplied evidence and declarations. App availability is shown on the control card.

Scope
Content intended for declared automated consumers.

Evidence
Prior plan/review, complete HTTP chains, raw HTML/JSON, attributed rendered tree and bound context reviews.

Method
Compare qualified values from each representation/rendered state to the plan; review whole critical context with representation-specific bindings.

Acceptance criteria
Coherent values and reviews; qualified contradiction retained despite other missing evidence.

When the result remains inconclusive
Missing/unknown review, rendering, value or attribution; unplanned supplied state or unsupported context.

Non-applicability
No automatic atomic exemption.

Assumptions
Supplied inventory, expected references, context and reviews; scope fixed before capture, unauthenticated evidence.

Limitations
First bounded HTML/JSON profile, optional Node and supplied rendered evidence; no authenticated CSS visibility, truth, reviewer identity, ingestion or citation. Authored DOM explicitly synthetic.